R.V. v. Mnuchin

Litigation Content

ICAP, in partnership with Villanova Law Professor Leslie Book, represented several U.S. citizen children and their parents in a federal class-action lawsuit challenging the CARES Act’s exclusion of mixed-status families from pandemic relief. Under the original 2020 law, stimulus checks were denied to any household where one or both parents filed taxes using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) instead of a Social Security Number. This policy effectively punished U.S. citizen children based solely on their parents’ immigration status, denying them the $500 per-child benefit intended to provide a lifeline during the COVID-19 economic crisis.

Plaintiffs argued that this exclusion violated the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection by creating a discriminatory classification that harmed children based on their “alienage.” In June 2020, ICAP secured a significant procedural victory when a federal judge in the District of Maryland denied the government’s motion to dismiss, ruling that the children had standing to sue and that the case raised serious constitutional questions. This legal pressure, alongside similar ICAP-supported advocacy, contributed to a major legislative shift: In December 2020, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which retroactively expanded eligibility to mixed-status families and allowed U.S. citizen children to receive the stimulus funds they were previously denied.


More of our cases

CASA v. Trump (2025)

ICAP represents a class of people for whom President Trump attempted to deny birthright citizenship by Executive Order.

Status

Decision issued

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 24A884

4th Circuit No. 25-1153 / 21-2188

D. Md. No. 25-00021

View

State of Indiana ex rel. Rokita v. Marté

ICAP is defending Monroe County Sheriff Ruben Marté and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit brought by the Indiana Attorney General alleging that the Sheriff must amend his immigration policy to allow for greater involvement of officers in immigration enforcement.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

Monroe County Circuit Court No. 53COG-2407-PL-001733

View

U.S. v. 14.259 Acres of Land in Doña Ana County, New Mexico

ICAP represents the Catholic Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, in defending against the United States Government’s efforts to exercise its power of eminent domain to take Diocesan property for the purpose of building a border wall that is contrary to Catholic values and teachings on the holy site, Mount Cristo Rey.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01458-KG-GBW

View

U.S. v. County of Washtenaw

ICAP is defending Washtenaw County Sheriff Alyshia Dyer and the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit that challenges their policy of limiting local involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

Status

Decision issued

Court

E.D. Mich. No. 26-cv-11166

View
See all cases