CASA v. Trump (2025)

Litigation Content

On Inauguration Day, President Trump signed an Executive Order attempting to reinterpret the 14th Amendment to deny birthright citizenship to children born to immigrant parents unless at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. ICAP responded immediately, filing a lawsuit on behalf of pregnant mothers and members of CASA and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP). The suit argues that the order violates the plain text of the Constitution and contradicts over a century of binding Supreme Court precedent establishing that all persons born on U.S. soil are citizens.

On February 5, 2025, ICAP secured the first preliminary injunction against the birthright citizenship Executive Order. Then, after the Supreme Court limited universal injunctions, ICAP pivoted within hours, filing an amended class-action complaint to ensure that protection was not restricted to the named plaintiffs. On August 7, 2025, the district court granted ICAP’s motion, certifying a nationwide class and enjoining the government from enforcing the order. Through this swift and strategic litigation, ICAP has preserved the fundamental right to citizenship for hundreds of thousands of children across the country. ICAP’s case was stayed pending appeals taken in other cases also challenging the birthright citizenship Executive Order. On June 30, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara (25-365), the United States Supreme Court declared that the Executive Order was unconstitutional, thus guaranteeing birthright citizenship to all children born in the United States.

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Barbara, President Trump issued a second Executive Order purporting to again limit birthright citizenship. ICAP moved for a new preliminary injunction to stop enforcement of the 2026 Executive Order against the members of the certified class, whom the Supreme Court had already held were citizens. On September 2, 2026, ICAP secured the first preliminary injunction against the 2026 Executive Order.


Major Filings 18

More of our cases

State of Indiana ex rel. Rokita v. Marté

ICAP is defending Monroe County Sheriff Ruben Marté and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit brought by the Indiana Attorney General alleging that the Sheriff must amend his immigration policy to allow for greater involvement of officers in immigration enforcement.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

Monroe County Circuit Court No. 53COG-2407-PL-001733

View

U.S. v. 14.259 Acres of Land in Doña Ana County, New Mexico

ICAP represents the Catholic Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, in defending against the United States Government’s efforts to exercise its power of eminent domain to take Diocesan property for the purpose of building a border wall that is contrary to Catholic values and teachings on the holy site, Mount Cristo Rey.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01458-KG-GBW

View

U.S. v. County of Washtenaw

ICAP is defending Washtenaw County Sheriff Alyshia Dyer and the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit that challenges their policy of limiting local involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

Status

Decision issued

Court

E.D. Mich. No. 26-cv-11166

View

Freedom of the Press Foundation v. Trump

ICAP represents CREW and Freedom of the Press Foundation on appeal in their challenge to the refusal of White House officials to ensure the preservation of presidential records as required by the Presidential Records Act.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D.C. Cir. No. 26-5186

View
See all cases