E.B. v. Pompeo

Litigation Content

ICAP successfully represented two aspiring immigrants and their families in a challenge to the “Passport Rule”—a 2019 policy that required applicants to possess a valid passport just to enter the Diversity Visa lottery. Previously, applicants needed to obtain a passport only if they were actually selected as winners. ICAP argued that the requirement erected a prohibitively expensive and time-consuming barrier for individuals in developing nations where passport ownership is rare and the cost can represent a significant portion of an individual’s annual income.

The litigation culminated in a decisive victory for global immigration access. In February 2022, a federal district court in the District of Columbia vacated the Passport Rule, finding that the State Department had unlawfully bypassed the mandatory notice-and-comment period required by the APA. The court rejected the government’s attempt to use the “foreign affairs exception” to justify its secrecy, finding that the Passport Rule did not involve sensitive international negotiations. By striking down this significant hurdle, ICAP’s victory restored the Diversity Visa Program to its original form, ensuring that millions of potential immigrants are not excluded from entering the lottery simply because they lack the financial means to secure a passport.


More of our cases

CASA v. Trump (2025)

ICAP represents a class of people for whom President Trump attempted to deny birthright citizenship by Executive Order.

Status

Decision issued

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 24A884

4th Circuit No. 25-1153 / 21-2188

D. Md. No. 25-00021

View

State of Indiana ex rel. Rokita v. Marté

ICAP is defending Monroe County Sheriff Ruben Marté and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit brought by the Indiana Attorney General alleging that the Sheriff must amend his immigration policy to allow for greater involvement of officers in immigration enforcement.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

Monroe County Circuit Court No. 53COG-2407-PL-001733

View

U.S. v. County of Washtenaw

ICAP is defending Washtenaw County Sheriff Alyshia Dyer and the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit that challenges their policy of limiting local involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

Status

Decision issued

Court

E.D. Mich. No. 26-cv-11166

View

U.S. v. New Mexico

ICAP is defending the State of New Mexico and New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez in defense of a newly enacted New Mexico law, the “Immigrant Safety Act.”

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 1:26-cv-01471-KG-LF

View
See all cases