U.S. v. New Mexico

Litigation Content

ICAP is defending the State of New Mexico and New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez in defense of a newly enacted New Mexico law, the “Immigrant Safety Act.” This state law, also known as House Bill 9 prohibits local jurisdictions from contracting with ICE to provide detention facilities or entering into agreements with ICE by which local law enforcement are given the powers of federal immigration agents. The federal government claims that federal law preempts the state law and that it violates principles of intergovernmental immunity and the U.S. Constitution’s Contract Clause. The state’s decision to avoid voluntary participation in federal immigration enforcement is entirely lawful exercise of New Mexico’s sovereignty, and ICAP will continue to represent New Mexico in defending the constitutionality of this law.  As part of this litigation, the State and Attorney General Raúl Torrez have also filed a counterclaim challenging a contract entered into by Otero County, New Mexico to provide immigration-detention services as contrary to New Mexico’s public policy and the Tenth Amendment.


More of our cases

CASA v. Trump (2025)

ICAP represents a class of people for whom President Trump attempted to deny birthright citizenship by Executive Order.

Status

Decision issued

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 24A884

4th Circuit No. 25-1153 / 21-2188

D. Md. No. 25-00021

View

State of Indiana ex rel. Rokita v. Marté

ICAP is defending Monroe County Sheriff Ruben Marté and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit brought by the Indiana Attorney General alleging that the Sheriff must amend his immigration policy to allow for greater involvement of officers in immigration enforcement.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

Monroe County Circuit Court No. 53COG-2407-PL-001733

View

U.S. v. 14.259 Acres of Land in Doña Ana County, New Mexico

ICAP represents the Catholic Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, in defending against the United States Government’s efforts to exercise its power of eminent domain to take Diocesan property for the purpose of building a border wall that is contrary to Catholic values and teachings on the holy site, Mount Cristo Rey.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01458-KG-GBW

View

U.S. v. County of Washtenaw

ICAP is defending Washtenaw County Sheriff Alyshia Dyer and the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office against a lawsuit that challenges their policy of limiting local involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

Status

Decision issued

Court

E.D. Mich. No. 26-cv-11166

View
See all cases