Herrera v. Cleveland

Litigation Content

ICAP represented Justin Herrera, a pre-trial detainee at Cook County Jail, in a federal civil rights lawsuit and a subsequent petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Herrera sought to hold three correctional officers accountable for failing to protect him from a brutal assault by other detainees and for denying him prompt medical care. Because he did not initially know the officers’ names, Mr. Herrera filed his timely original complaint using “John Doe” placeholders. Once he identified the officers through discovery, he amended his complaint—but the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the amendment was untimely. The court held that using a “John Doe” placeholder is a deliberate choice due to a “lack of knowledge” rather than a “mistake,” meaning the amendment could not “relate back” to the original filing date under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c)(1)(C).

Although the Supreme Court declined to hear the case in March 2022, ICAP’s work on Herrera remains a cornerstone of the national effort to reform “relation back” rules, ensuring that technicalities do not prevent victims of state violence from seeking justice.


More of our cases

CASA v. Trump (2025)

ICAP represents a class of people for whom President Trump attempted to deny birthright citizenship by Executive Order.

Status

Decision issued

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 24A884

4th Circuit No. 25-1153 / 21-2188

D. Md. No. 25-00021

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View

Mullin v. Al Otro Lado

ICAP represented the nonprofit Al Otro Lado, Inc., and a class of asylum seekers before the Supreme Court in defending a Ninth Circuit decision striking down a turnback policy under which border officers physically blocked asylum seekers arriving at ports of entry in order to prevent them from lawfully presenting their asylum claims.

Status

Decision issued

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-5

View

Ermold v. Davis

ICAP represented David Ermold and David Moore, a same-sex couple who were unlawfully denied a marriage license by then-Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, in defiance of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which established the fundamental right of same-sex couples to marry.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-125

6th Circuit No. 24-5524

View
See all cases