Acheson Hotels v. Laufer

Litigation Content

After the Supreme Court granted certiorari, ICAP stepped in to represent and present oral argument on behalf of Ms. Laufer, a disabled person who was unable to access information about hotel accessibility that federal law requires the hotel to provide. The question presented to the Court was whether Ms. Laufer had Article III standing to challenge the lack of accessibility information and assert her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. After the Supreme Court granted certorari, subsequent developments mooted the case, which led the Supreme Court to dismiss the case as moot without resolving the standing issue.

Oral Argument:


More of our cases

CASA v. Trump (2025)

ICAP represents a class of people for whom President Trump attempted to deny birthright citizenship by Executive Order.

Status

Decision issued

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 24A884

4th Circuit No. 25-1153 / 21-2188

D. Md. No. 25-00021

View

Alkayali v. Kaler

ICAP represents three plaintiffs who were targeted for their expressive protest activity at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU).

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

6th Circuit No. 26-3282

View

Welty v. Dunaway

ICAP represents Tennessee state representative Aftyn Behn and family law attorney Rachel Welty in a constitutional challenge to a state law that criminalizes "recruiting" a minor to obtain an abortion, even an abortion that occurs legally outside Tennessee.

Status

Awaiting Decision

Court

6th Circuit No. 24-5968 / 25-5738 / 25-5739

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View
See all cases