Silva v. United States

Litigation Content

ICAP, in partnership with Rights Behind Bars, represented an incarcerated individual in a federal lawsuit against a correctional officer who assaulted him while he was fully restrained. The case highlighted an egregious violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, as well as the Fourth Amendment’s protections against excessive force. The litigation challenges the culture of impunity within the federal prison system and the high bar of qualified immunity. By representing Mr. Silva, ICAP aims to establish that the constitutional right of an incarcerated person to be free from physical abuse, especially when they pose no threat to security, is clearly established and must be vindicated in court.


More of our cases

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View

Fitzhugh v. Patton

ICAP successfully opposed Supreme Court review of a decision allowing pretrial detainees to bring Fourteenth Amendment claims challenging unconstitutional conditions of confinement.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-50

View

Rohrer v. City of Gastonia

ICAP represents Joshua Rohrer, a disabled, formerly unhoused veteran, in a federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Gastonia and current or former members of its police department.

Status

Litigation stayed

Court

W.D.N.C. No. 23-cv-396

View

Frazier v. Prince George’s County

ICAP represents a class of current and former pretrial detainees in a constitutional challenge to the bail system in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

4th Circuit No. 24-1380

D. Md. No. 22-cv-01768

View
See all cases