Kim v. Board of Education of Howard County

Litigation Content

ICAP successfully represented the Board of Education of Howard County, Maryland, in a federal constitutional challenge to the role of the Student Member of the Board (SMOB). The plaintiffs, a group of parents, argued that allowing a student to hold a voting seat on the Board violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one-person, one-vote” principle by diluting the voting power of adult residents. They further alleged a First Amendment violation, claiming the selection process discriminated against students in religious or private schools who are ineligible to vote for or serve as the SMOB.

The litigation concluded with a significant victory for student representation in governance. In February 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the lawsuit. The court ruled that the SMOB position is “basically appointive” rather than elective in a constitutional sense, as the selection process is heavily shepherded by school officials and requires final board confirmation. Consequently, the “one-person, one-vote” rule did not apply. The court also rejected the First Amendment claim, finding the policy was a neutral and generally applicable rule that applied to all non-public school students regardless of their religious status. This decision secured the continued right of students to participate as voting members of their local educational governing bodies


More of our cases

Alkayali v. Kaler

ICAP represents three plaintiffs who were targeted for their expressive protest activity at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU).

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

6th Circuit No. 26-3282

View

Welty v. Dunaway

ICAP represents Tennessee state representative Aftyn Behn and family law attorney Rachel Welty in a constitutional challenge to a state law that criminalizes "recruiting" a minor to obtain an abortion, even an abortion that occurs legally outside Tennessee.

Status

Awaiting Decision

Court

6th Circuit No. 24-5968 / 25-5738 / 25-5739

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View

State of Minnesota v. U.S. Department of Justice

ICAP has partnered with the Hennepin County Attorney and Minnesota Attorney General to challenge the federal government’s attempt to block access to key evidence in the shootings by federal agents during “Operation Metro Surge.”

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-01007

View
See all cases