Commonwealth v. Wittman

Litigation Content

ICAP represented Michael Wittman as part of his criminal case, assisting him in raising a defense based on a constitutional challenge to the statute under which he was charged. Mr. Wittman was charged with a misdemeanor under a law enacted in 2018 that prohibits the use of any device to capture photographs, video, or audio within a “judicial facility” or its immediate surroundings without prior court approval. The charges arose after Mr. Wittman used his cell phone to take photographs during a break in proceedings at a magisterial district court.

ICAP filed a Motion to Quash the Information against Mr. Wittman, arguing that the statute is an unconstitutional “prior restraint” on expressive activity. The challenge asserted that the law is impermissibly overbroad because it criminalizes documentation of public activity in public spaces, including sidewalks and areas adjacent to courthouses, without requiring any showing of actual harm or disruption.


More of our cases

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View

Fitzhugh v. Patton

ICAP successfully opposed Supreme Court review of a decision allowing pretrial detainees to bring Fourteenth Amendment claims challenging unconstitutional conditions of confinement.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-50

View

Rohrer v. City of Gastonia

ICAP represents Joshua Rohrer, a disabled, formerly unhoused veteran, in a federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Gastonia and current or former members of its police department.

Status

Litigation stayed

Court

W.D.N.C. No. 23-cv-396

View

Frazier v. Prince George’s County

ICAP represents a class of current and former pretrial detainees in a constitutional challenge to the bail system in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

4th Circuit No. 24-1380

D. Md. No. 22-cv-01768

View
See all cases