Commonwealth v. Vanasdale

Litigation Content

ICAP successfully represented Jennifer Gilliland Vanasdale, an attorney and judicial candidate, against misdemeanor charges for allegedly taking a courtroom photograph before proceedings began. The prosecution relied on a Pennsylvania statute criminalizing the use of recording devices in court regardless of whether the act was disruptive. ICAP argued the charges constituted a violation of the First Amendment and selective prosecution aimed at a judicial critic.

This constitutional defense led the Commonwealth to dismiss all charges in January 2021, securing a victory for courtroom transparency and the right to document judicial environments.


More of our cases

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View

Fitzhugh v. Patton

ICAP successfully opposed Supreme Court review of a decision allowing pretrial detainees to bring Fourteenth Amendment claims challenging unconstitutional conditions of confinement.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-50

View

Rohrer v. City of Gastonia

ICAP represents Joshua Rohrer, a disabled, formerly unhoused veteran, in a federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Gastonia and current or former members of its police department.

Status

Litigation stayed

Court

W.D.N.C. No. 23-cv-396

View

Frazier v. Prince George’s County

ICAP represents a class of current and former pretrial detainees in a constitutional challenge to the bail system in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

4th Circuit No. 24-1380

D. Md. No. 22-cv-01768

View
See all cases