Nicholson v. City of Gary, Indiana; Serbon v. City of East Chicago

Litigation Content

ICAP served as lead counsel for the City of Gary, Indiana, in defending its “Welcoming City” ordinance against a major legal challenge. The ordinance, enacted in 2017, was designed to protect the rights of immigrant residents by limiting local law enforcement’s voluntary participation in federal immigration investigations. A group of plaintiffs, backed by national anti-immigrant organizations, sued the city, alleging that the ordinance violated a state statute (Indiana Code § 5-2-18.2) that prohibits local “sanctuary city” policies.

ICAP successfully argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit because they had not suffered any specific, concrete injury. In July 2022, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in favor of the City of Gary, holding that the state’s “public standing” doctrine and the specific citizen-suit provision of the anti-sanctuary statute did not exempt plaintiffs from the constitutional requirement to demonstrate a personal injury. By securing the dismissal of the lawsuit, ICAP protected Gary’s ability to foster community trust between local police and immigrant residents, while establishing a critical precedent that prevents uninjured litigants from using Indiana’s courts to challenge local government policies.


Major Filings 12

More of our cases

Alkayali v. Kaler

ICAP represents three plaintiffs who were targeted for their expressive protest activity at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU).

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

6th Circuit No. 26-3282

View

Welty v. Dunaway

ICAP represents Tennessee state representative Aftyn Behn and family law attorney Rachel Welty in a constitutional challenge to a state law that criminalizes "recruiting" a minor to obtain an abortion, even an abortion that occurs legally outside Tennessee.

Status

Awaiting Decision

Court

6th Circuit No. 24-5968 / 25-5738 / 25-5739

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View

State of Minnesota v. U.S. Department of Justice

ICAP has partnered with the Hennepin County Attorney and Minnesota Attorney General to challenge the federal government’s attempt to block access to key evidence in the shootings by federal agents during “Operation Metro Surge.”

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-01007

View
See all cases