NAACP v. Wilson

Litigation Content

ICAP represented the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and individual members in a First Amendment challenge to South Carolina’s “Unauthorized Practice of Law” (UPL) statutes. In South Carolina, an estimated 99% of tenants face eviction without legal representation. To address this, the NAACP developed a Housing Advocate Program to train non-lawyers to provide free, limited, and accurate guidance. Under state law governing the unauthorized practice of law, however, even providing simple legal information can be prosecuted as a felony if done by a non-attorney.
In February 2024, following ICAP’s federal lawsuit and a parallel petition to the state’s highest court, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued a historic order authorizing a three-year pilot program. The court ruled that NAACP-trained volunteers could provide specific, limited assistance to tenants without fear of UPL prosecution, provided they adhered to strict training and supervision guidelines.


More of our cases

U.S. v. 14.259 Acres of Land in Doña Ana County, New Mexico

ICAP represents the Catholic Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, in defending against the United States Government’s efforts to exercise its power of eminent domain to take Diocesan property for the purpose of building a border wall that is contrary to Catholic values and teachings on the holy site, Mount Cristo Rey.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01458-KG-GBW

View

Alkayali v. Kaler

ICAP represents three plaintiffs who were targeted for their expressive protest activity at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU).

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

6th Circuit No. 26-3282

View

Welty v. Dunaway

ICAP represents Tennessee state representative Aftyn Behn and family law attorney Rachel Welty in a constitutional challenge to a state law that criminalizes "recruiting" a minor to obtain an abortion, even an abortion that occurs legally outside Tennessee.

Status

Awaiting Decision

Court

6th Circuit No. 24-5968 / 25-5738 / 25-5739

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View
See all cases