Fonseca v. City of Medford

Litigation Content

ICAP represents award-winning journalist April Fonseca in a civil rights challenge to her arrest while reporting on a police operation clearing an encampment from a park in Medford, Oregon. Although the police allowed cleanup volunteers into the park during the clearance, they barred journalists and observers. When Ms. Fonseca attempted to document the event, police arrested her.

After criminal charges were dismissed, Ms. Fonseca filed suit alleging violations of her First and Fourth Amendment rights, alongside state-law claims for battery and false arrest. The district court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in full and rejected their claim of qualified immunity. ICAP has joined the case to represent Ms. Fonseca in the defendants’ appeal of the qualified-immunity ruling to defend the fundamental right of the press to document police activity in public spaces.

From the Brief:

Constitutional safeguards for the press’s ability to report on government operations cannot be disregarded because officials see them as inconvenient or would prefer to carry out enforcement actions away from public view.

Oral Argument:


More of our cases

U.S. v. 14.259 Acres of Land in Doña Ana County, New Mexico

ICAP represents the Catholic Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, in defending against the United States Government’s efforts to exercise its power of eminent domain to take Diocesan property for the purpose of building a border wall that is contrary to Catholic values and teachings on the holy site, Mount Cristo Rey.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01458-KG-GBW

View

Alkayali v. Kaler

ICAP represents three plaintiffs who were targeted for their expressive protest activity at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU).

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

6th Circuit No. 26-3282

View

Welty v. Dunaway

ICAP represents Tennessee state representative Aftyn Behn and family law attorney Rachel Welty in a constitutional challenge to a state law that criminalizes "recruiting" a minor to obtain an abortion, even an abortion that occurs legally outside Tennessee.

Status

Awaiting Decision

Court

6th Circuit No. 24-5968 / 25-5738 / 25-5739

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View
See all cases