Abolitionist Law Center v. Mariani

Litigation Content

ICAP, in partnership with the ACLU of Pennsylvania, represented the Abolitionist Law Center (ALC) in a First Amendment challenge to the exclusionary practices of an Allegheny County judge. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Judge Anthony Mariani conducted criminal court proceedings virtually but prohibited members of the public—including ALC’s court-watchers—from observing the remote sessions. ICAP argued that this policy violated the long-standing constitutional right of public access to criminal trials, asserting that a “virtual courtroom” is still a public courtroom and cannot be shielded from oversight simply because of its digital format.

The litigation achieved a swift, systemic victory for judicial transparency. Shortly after the suit was filed, the President Judge of Pennsylvania’s Fifth Judicial District intervened by issuing a district-wide administrative order that explicitly directed all judges to provide public virtual access to any proceedings conducted remotely, ensuring that the “open courts” mandate was upheld during the public health crisis. Following this clear policy shift, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit in June 2021.


More of our cases

U.S. v. 14.259 Acres of Land in Doña Ana County, New Mexico

ICAP represents the Catholic Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, in defending against the United States Government’s efforts to exercise its power of eminent domain to take Diocesan property for the purpose of building a border wall that is contrary to Catholic values and teachings on the holy site, Mount Cristo Rey.

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

D. N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01458-KG-GBW

View

Alkayali v. Kaler

ICAP represents three plaintiffs who were targeted for their expressive protest activity at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU).

Status

Briefing is ongoing

Court

6th Circuit No. 26-3282

View

Welty v. Dunaway

ICAP represents Tennessee state representative Aftyn Behn and family law attorney Rachel Welty in a constitutional challenge to a state law that criminalizes "recruiting" a minor to obtain an abortion, even an abortion that occurs legally outside Tennessee.

Status

Awaiting Decision

Court

6th Circuit No. 24-5968 / 25-5738 / 25-5739

View

Singleton v. Taylor

ICAP filed a brief opposing the Supreme Court review of a decision striking down Alabama's anti-panhandling laws as violations of the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Status

Cert denied

Court

U.S. Supreme Court No. 25-368

View
See all cases